Dialogue in Peirce, Lotman, and Bakhtin: A comparative study Cover Image

Dialogue in Peirce, Lotman, and Bakhtin: A comparative study
Dialogue in Peirce, Lotman, and Bakhtin: A comparative study

Author(s): Oliver Laas
Subject(s): Semiology, Communication studies, Structuralism and Post-Structuralism
Published by: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus
Keywords: dialogue; dialogism; games; logic; game theory; semiotics; semiosphere;

Summary/Abstract: The notion of dialogue is foundational for both Juri Lotman and Mikhail Bakhtin. It is also central in Charles S. Peirce’s semeiotics and logic. While there are several scholarly comparisons of Bakhtin’s and Lotman’s dialogisms, these have yet to be compared with Peirce’s semeiotic dialogues. This article takes tentative steps toward a comparative study of dialogue in Peirce, Lotman, and Bakhtin. Peirce’s understanding of dialogue is explicated, and compared with both Lotman’s as well as Bakhtin’s conceptions. Lotman saw dialogue as the basic meaning-making mechanism in the semio sphere. The benefits and shortcomings of reconceptualizing the semiosphere on the basis of Peircean and Bakhtinian dialogues are weighed. The aim is to explore methodological alternatives in semiotics, not to challenge Lotman’s initial model. It is claimed that the semiosphere qua model operating with Bakhtinian dialogues is narrower in scope than Lotman’s original conception, while the semiosphere qua model operating with Peircean dialogues appears to be broader in scope. It is concluded that the choice between alternative dialogical foundations must be informed by attentiveness to their differences, and should be motivated by the researcher’s goals and theoretical commitments.

  • Issue Year: 44/2016
  • Issue No: 4
  • Page Range: 469-493
  • Page Count: 25
  • Language: English