REFLECTIONS UPON THE LEGAL NORM INCLUDED IN ARTICLE 215(2) LETTER D IN THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE IMPLICATIONS GENERATED BY ITS EQUIVOCAL CHARACTER Cover Image

REFLECȚII ASUPRA NORMEI JURIDICE PREVĂZUTE DE ART.215 (2) LITERA DIN CODUL DE PROCEDURĂ PENALĂ ÎN CONTEXTUL IMPLICAȚIILOR GENERATE DE CARACTERUL SĂU ECHIVOC
REFLECTIONS UPON THE LEGAL NORM INCLUDED IN ARTICLE 215(2) LETTER D IN THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE IMPLICATIONS GENERATED BY ITS EQUIVOCAL CHARACTER

Author(s): Corina-Cristina Buzdugan, Camelia Reghini
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Facultatea de Drept Cluj Napoca, Universitatea Creştina "Dimitrie Cantemir" Bucureşti
Keywords: legal supervision; unconstitutionality; prohibition of communicating; predictability; legal norms.

Summary/Abstract: Starting from a practical case, the article aims at submitting to examination the way, debatable in our opinion, in which the lawmaker has understood to regulate, in the context of legal supervision, the defendant’s obligation of non-communicating either directly or indirectly, by any means, with certain persons. More exactly, the purpose of our initiative is to underline the fact that the legal norm should have a predictable character, because, otherwise, it may generate consequences of a considerable gravity for the person it is addressed to.

  • Issue Year: 2/2015
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 154-157
  • Page Count: 3
  • Language: English