COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE TRADITIONAL METHOD AND THE METHOD SUGGESTED BY THE AUTHORS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF THE LEFT-SIDED OBTURATIONAL COLON OBSTRUCTION
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE TRADITIONAL METHOD AND THE METHOD SUGGESTED BY THE AUTHORS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF THE LEFT-SIDED OBTURATIONAL COLON OBSTRUCTION

Summary/Abstract: The problem of surgical treatment of the left-side colon obstruction still remains quite relevant for surgeons and oncologists (1 ;9;5). This is testified by various publications regarding the technical issues of surgical treatment of the mentioned pathology (3;12;13). The fact, that in spite of substantial improvement of surgical involvement technique, the lethality still fluctuates between 5.6% and 26%, is rather alarming. (1 l;14) Therefore, even in the previous century, as early as in 1964 and up to the last year surgeons had quite negative attitude towards bazar's suggestion to carry out the resection without application of colostomy. Some surgeons preferred the formation of decompressive colostomy and the tumour removal was postponed until the general condition of the patient was improved (8; 6). The supporters of radical operation suggested intestine resection, colostomy laying and during the second stage -the intestine integrity was rehabilitated (7; 10). Some surgeons showed maximum caution and supported the treatment according to Zeidler-Schloffer method (4).

• Details
• Contents