Opinia prawna w sprawie wezwania z 3 czerwca 2016 r. skierowanego przez Inwestora w ramach procedury pojednawczej dotyczącego sporu na podstawie umowy między Rządem Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej a Rządem Królestwa Danii w sprawie popierania (...)
Legal opinion on the notice of 3 June 2016 addressed by the Investor under the conciliation procedure concerning the dispute on the basis of the Agreement between the Government of the Polish Republic and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark(...)

Summary/Abstract: The author claims that neither the Sejm nor any of its bodies is competent to reply to the notice. Due to the general and hypothetical nature of the allegations regarding the alleged damages suffered by the Investor, referring to them at this stage should be regarded as premature. From the statements contained in the notice it follows that the procedure for the resolution of disputes specified in Article 9 para. 2 of the Agreement of 1 May 1990 cannot be used in this respect. The indicated three-month time limit for resolving the dispute through negotiation is devoid of legal basis and, as such, not binding. If the dispute is described in the notice will be the subject of court proceedings, differences in the answers given by each recipient of the notice may be used against Poland or the State Treasury. For this reason, it is worth considering coordinating the preparation of response to the notice by all its recipients to prevent a disparity between them.

• Details
• Contents