The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea
The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea

Summary/Abstract: Crimea’s secession from Ukraine and its annexation to the Russian Federation invoked Kosovo precedent, in its declaration of independence, as an argument for secession. The territorial refer-endum in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, only five days after the declaration of independence, was an attempt to justify the secession based on the right to self-determination of the people of Crimea. It is overwhelmingly considered illegal and its outcome has not been accepted and recog-nized by states, regional and international organizations. The comparative elements of statehood and secession between Kosovo and Crimea are reflected through analyzing the declarations of in-dependence, international recognition and Russia’s role as a third-state factor in external self-determination. Essential distinctions are highlighted. Kosovo is widely acknowledged and accepted a sui generis case. Its declaration of independence came as result of a long-monitored comprehen-sive process; not to legitimize the right for self-determination but as the final option for stability and peace in the region. Crimea seceded in violation of international law through the use of force. While Kosovo is a democratic, multi-ethnic new state and recognized by 107states, the secession of Cri-mea and its annexation to the Russian Federation is considered illegal and endangers the existing international order.

• Details
• Contents