Inequality in Congruence: Gender Gap and Electoral Rules Cover Image

Inequality in Congruence: Gender Gap and Electoral Rules
Inequality in Congruence: Gender Gap and Electoral Rules

Author(s): Daniela Širinić
Subject(s): Gender Studies, Electoral systems, Politics and law, Politics and society, Comparative politics
Published by: Fakultet političkih znanosti u Zagrebu
Keywords: Inequality in Congruence; Gender gap; Electoral rules; Representation; Comparative Politics

Summary/Abstract: A number of studies on political representation focus on the comparative assessments of citizen ideological congruence. But this literature has largely overlooked an important topic: the representation of social groups. While present studies of congruence investigate whether some countries perform better than others in terms of the levels of median citizen congruence, they cannot say much about the extent to which political elites give adequate concern to every group of citizens in the representative process. In this paper I introduce the concept and measure of inequality in congruence and demonstrate its properties by comparing gender groups. I also ask whether virtues of proportional electoral arrangements endure when we consider group differences in ideological representation. Empirical tests that were conducted on data from 88 legislative elections in 33 countries strongly suggest that gender inequality in congruence is in fact considerably smaller in countries with majoritarian arrangements.

  • Issue Year: LII/2015
  • Issue No: 04+05
  • Page Range: 124-141
  • Page Count: 17
  • Language: English