Lehet-e a társadalom igazságos?
Can a society be just?

Summary/Abstract: 1. Freedom is not the natural state of the individual but is a social achievement. Our social behaviour is primarily motivated by the desire to be understood and agreed with by others. Individual choices can never be made independently of others: Individuals either select or dismiss each other. We can liberate only each other. 2. If it is freedom that connects us instead of dividing us, then people in a political community should be able to discuss the goodness of their goals meaningfully. Equality of freedom, if it has any meaning, implies that all people can take part in the discussion, and that all people share the responsibility for their choices. 3. The concept of Good, the most important of our goods, is common and indivisible. If we did not know what to identify as right or wrong, disadvantage or advantage, then on what basis could we demand to be treated rightfully? 4. Only when participation is forced does removing disparities seem fair. In free association, we need our collaborators to acknowledge and articulate that our contrasting viewpoints are fundamental and incommensurable. However, to be able to diverge, one needs the help of others. Everyone „needs” more than their „allocation.” Mutual devotion is the only way to be fair.

• Details
• Contents