QUI SINE PECCATO EST VESTRUM PRIMUS LAPIDEM MITTAT
QUI SINE PECCATO EST VESTRUM PRIMUS LAPIDEM MITTAT
Author(s): Giovanni Brandi Cordasco SalmenaSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Jewish studies, History of Law, History of Judaism, Roman law
Published by: Софийски университет »Св. Климент Охридски«
Keywords: Adultery; capital punishments; Roman criminal legislation; Sanhedrin of Jerusalem.
Summary/Abstract: The well-known episode of the adulteress, as recounted in John 8:7, is a clear indication that, under Roman dominion, Judea no longer held the authority to issue or execute capital sentences. The fact that many Church Fathers did not engage with this passage, or that it is absent from numerous ancient manuscripts, does not necessarily imply ignorance of its existence or canonical status. It is highly plausible that early Christianity, given its moral rigidity concerning certain grave sins such as adultery, deliberately downplayed the episode so as to avoid acknowledging the Nazarene’s willingness to remit such transgressions. Nonetheless, aside from the ethical implications—which are only marginally relevant in this context—adultery, along with other capital offences (including those leading to the execution of Jesus of Nazareth), ceased to fall under the jurisdiction of the Jerusalem Sanhedrin following the establishment of Roman rule, as capital jurisdiction had become the exclusive prerogative of the Roman authorities.
Journal: IUS ROMANUM
- Issue Year: 2025
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 380-397
- Page Count: 18
- Language: Italian
