From Dehumanization to Digital Empathy: The Candidates’ Experience in AI-Enabled Hiring Cover Image

From Dehumanization to Digital Empathy: The Candidates’ Experience in AI-Enabled Hiring
From Dehumanization to Digital Empathy: The Candidates’ Experience in AI-Enabled Hiring

Author(s): Oliver Güth
Subject(s): Social Sciences, Economy, Psychology, Human Resources in Economy, ICT Information and Communications Technologies
Published by: Университет по библиотекознание и информационни технологии
Keywords: AI-Enabled Recruitment; Digital Empathy; Candidate Experience; Dehumanization; Human-Centered AI

Summary/Abstract: Artificial intelligence-enabled hiring technologies are increasingly used to automate early recruitment interactions through chatbots and algorithmic screening. However, these systems frequently produce candidate experiences characterized by dehumanization, impersonality, and reduced interpersonal regard. This conceptual qualitative synthesis draws on evidence from organizational psychology, human-computer interaction, and conversational user experience research to address a critical gap: although AI recruitment tools are commonly evaluated for operational efficiency, human-centered design principles that protect candidate dignity remain insufficiently examined. This study introduces a digital empathy approach, a tool-agnostic interaction design that enables recruitment chatbots to convey situational sensitivity and organizational regard without attributing emotion or judgment to the machine. Through synthesis of peer-reviewed literature on algorithmic fairness, trust formation, and conversational agent design, the approach suggests five core dimensions: transparent process orientation (including role disclosure, rationale statements, and boundary-setting), emotional acknowledgment (non-deceptive normalization of candidate concerns), feedback architecture (structured updates, time expectations, and explanation boundaries), controlled anthropomorphism (a warm, professional tone without humanlike identity cues), and repair and escalation mechanisms (clarification prompts, error admissions, and pathways to human contact). Empirical evidence indicates that candidates often perceive algorithmic assessment as reductionistic and procedurally unjust. Furthermore, providing explanations enhances perceptions of fairness and recommendation intentions, regardless of the decision-maker’s nature. Early interaction quality has a disproportionate impact on trust due to thin-slice judgment processes and algorithm aversion. The approach suggests actionable guidance for HR practitioners and highlights priorities for experimental validation, cross-cultural replication, and assessment of chatbot-mediated recruitment outcomes.

  • Issue Year: IV/2026
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 58-64
  • Page Count: 7
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode