The non-phenomenality of the face and the illeity of the animal: Questioning the anthropological difference from the perspective of Emmanuel Levinas’s phenomenology Cover Image

Non-fenomenalitatea chipului și illeitatea animalului – chestionarea diferenței antropologice din perspectiva fenomenologiei lui Emmanuel Levinas
The non-phenomenality of the face and the illeity of the animal: Questioning the anthropological difference from the perspective of Emmanuel Levinas’s phenomenology

Author(s): Paul Gabriel Sandu
Subject(s): Philosophy, Philosophical Traditions, Ethics / Practical Philosophy, Phenomenology
Published by: Editura Academiei Române
Keywords: Levinas; face; animal ethics; Rilke; transcendence; alterity; responsibility;

Summary/Abstract: This article revisits Emmanuel Levinas’s notion of the face by reading it alongside Rainer Maria Rilke’s Archaic Torso of Apollo. Against the anatomical reduction of the face, I argue that, in Levinas’s own terms, the face is an event of transcendence - an appeal that precedes cognition and ruptures the subject’s spontaneity - and that this event can appear beyond the human. Rilke’s fragmentary torso, which “sees” with all its parts and issues the imperative Du musst dein Leben ändern, functions as a phenomenological analogue of the Levinasian face: a visibility that withdraws at the very moment it addresses us, turning mere stone (or flesh) into command. On this basis, I propose a hermeneutic shift: if we abandon the metaphysical language of totality and the anthropological partition that reserves “face” to the human, we are compelled to admit that non-human animals can “have” a face—i.e., can present an irreducible exteriority that obligates us ethically.

  • Issue Year: LXXII/2025
  • Issue No: 6
  • Page Range: 901-912
  • Page Count: 12
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode