Iran’s Dual Strategy in the Middle East: Proxy Warfare, Nuclear Ambitions, and Strategic Recalibration
Iran’s Dual Strategy in the Middle East: Proxy Warfare, Nuclear Ambitions, and Strategic Recalibration

Summary/Abstract: Iran’s foreign policy in the Middle East is characterized by a dual strategy of proxy warfare and nuclear ambitions, which together form the backbone of its regional influence. The strategic landscape shifted dramatically following the events of October 7, 2023, and the subsequent2024 setbacks, including the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and the significant degradation of Hezbollah’s capabilities, which challenged but did not fundamentally negate this dual strategy. Rather, these developments compelled a strategic recalibration that reveals both the resilience and the inherent vulnerabilities of Iran’s approach. This analysis employs a focused theoretical framework integrating neorealist security dilemma theory and regime survival theory as primary analytical lenses, complemented by strategic culture theory to contextualize ideological constraints. The findings reveal that Iran’s proxy network strategy creates strategic depth and asymmetric deterrence capabilities, while its nuclear program serves as a long-term deterrent against regime change. While the “Unification of Arenas” strategy suffered significant disruption in 2024, Iran’s strategic posture has demonstrated adaptive resilience through accelerated nuclear advancement and reconstitution efforts across remaining proxy theaters. However, this dual approach also generates escalating regional militarization and alliance formation against Iranian interests, creating a security dilemma that may ultimately undermine Iran’s objectives.

• Details
• Contents