Mnoga podstawa faktyczna powództwa a kumulacja roszczeń procesowych. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 28 sierpnia 2019 r. (IV CSK 255/18, LEX nr 2729030)
Multiplicity of Factual Grounds of an Action and Accumulation of Procedural Claims: Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 28 August 2019 (IV CSK 255/18, LEX no. 2729030)
Author(s): Edyta GapskaSubject(s): Civil Law, Philosophy of Law, Court case
Published by: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej
Keywords: objective accumulation of claims; multiplicity of claims; factual basis of claim; civil trial;
Summary/Abstract: In the commented judgment, the Supreme Court considered, among other things, if a situation in which the claimant formulates one claim, basing it on various sets of facts, could be recognized as an objective accumulation of claims. Assuming that the dissimilarity of the alternative factual grounds entails the emergence of two or more procedural claims, the Court concluded that the multiplicity of claims (objective accumulation of claims) occurs when the claims differ from each other either in terms of the content of the claims, or in terms of sets of factual circumstances which justify them, or simultanously by both of these elements. When submitting multiple claims, the claimant should specify precisely not only the content of each claim and the factual circumstances justifying it, but also specify the relationship between the accumulated claims. While the detailed threads of the quoted position should be partially approved, the underlying view assuming that the submission of one claim with multiple factual justification is equivalent to objective accumulation of procedural claims should be critically considered. This view does not seem to take into account
Journal: Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
- Issue Year: 34/2025
- Issue No: 5
- Page Range: 365-381
- Page Count: 17
- Language: Polish
