NAVIGATING DISPUTES BEYOND EARTH: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PCA OUTER SPACE RULES
NAVIGATING DISPUTES BEYOND EARTH: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PCA OUTER SPACE RULES

Summary/Abstract: The rapid commercialization of outer space, including satellite deployment, space tourism, and asteroid mining, has created an urgent need for effective dispute settlement mechanisms. As private and international actors increasingly participate in space activities, disputes are likely to intensify. In response, the Permanent Court of Arbitration adopted the 2011 Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activities, establishing a specialized framework for resolving space-related conflicts. This paper critically examines these Rules, highlighting features such as confidentiality protections, technical expertise, and party autonomy. It assesses their compatibility with existing international space law, including the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, while identifying challenges related to voluntary jurisdiction and enforcement of awards. Through illustrative dispute scenarios, the study evaluates the Rules’ practical relevance and proposes reforms to enhance their accessibility, effectiveness, and alignment with contemporary international space governance.

• Details
• Contents