2. Joint venture. Legal action filed by the county council, as a member of the joint venture. Absence of proof of the capacity as representative of the county council president. Consequences Cover Image
  • Price 5.40 €

2. Asociere în participaţiune. Acţiune în justiţie formulată de consiliul judeţean, în calitate de membru al asocierii. Lipsa dovezii calităţii de reprezentant al preşedintelui consiliului judeţean. Consecinţe
2. Joint venture. Legal action filed by the county council, as a member of the joint venture. Absence of proof of the capacity as representative of the county council president. Consequences

Author(s): Minodora Condoiu
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: county council president’s procedural capacity; representation of administrative‑territorial unit; requirement of written mandate; joint venture litigation;

Summary/Abstract: The county council president does not have the capacity as representative in court ope legis, but only of representative in court of the county, as an administrative-territorial unit. Therefore, in case of a legal action filed by the county council, as a member of a joint venture, the president of the county council must submit a written mandate.

  • Issue Year: 2014
  • Issue No: 03
  • Page Range: 25-29
  • Page Count: 5
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode