9. Cerere accesorie care vizează o operaţiune postprivatizare. Competenţă materială. Inaplicabilitatea dispoziţiilor art. 17 Codul de procedură civilă de la 1865
9. Accessory claim aiming at a post privatization operation. Material jurisdiction. Non enforcement of the provisions of art. 17 of the previous Code of civil procedure
Author(s): Oana StanSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: special material jurisdiction; incidental claims; accessory claims;
Summary/Abstract: If there is a special material jurisdiction for the incidental or accessory claims, they will be settled according to the provisions of the special law, and in this case the provisions of art. 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure are not enforceable.
Journal: Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă
- Issue Year: 2014
- Issue No: 01
- Page Range: 61-62
- Page Count: 2
- Language: Romanian
- Content File-PDF
