THE USE OF RECORDINGS OF ONE’S OWN CONVERSATIONS AS MEANS OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. ELEMENTS OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY. THE NEED TO RESTRICT THEIR ADMISSIBILITY TO THE SPHERE OF IN FLAGRANT OFFENCES Cover Image

FOLOSIREA ÎNREGISTRĂRILOR PROPRIILOR CONVORBIRI CA MIJLOACE DE PROBĂ ÎN PROCESUL PENAL. ELEMENTE DE NECONSTITUŢIONALITATE. NECESITATEA RESTRÂNGERII ADMISIBILITĂŢII ACESTORA LA SFERA INFRACŢIUNILOR FLAGRANTE
THE USE OF RECORDINGS OF ONE’S OWN CONVERSATIONS AS MEANS OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. ELEMENTS OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY. THE NEED TO RESTRICT THEIR ADMISSIBILITY TO THE SPHERE OF IN FLAGRANT OFFENCES

Author(s): Mihai Giurgea
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: means of evidence; unconstitutionality; criminal trial;

Summary/Abstract: Normative ambiguity creates a situation in which citizens cannot foresee when and under what conditions their private conversations may become means of evidence in a criminal trial. This uncertainty is manifested through multiple normative gaps, which leave undetermined essential aspects of the legal regime applicable to private recordings.

  • Issue Year: 2025
  • Issue No: 12
  • Page Range: 85-90
  • Page Count: 6
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode