Models of Internal Party Democracy: Comparative Lessons from Four Advanced Democracies for Eastern Europe
Models of Internal Party Democracy: Comparative Lessons from Four Advanced Democracies for Eastern Europe

Summary/Abstract: This article presents a comparative analysis of international best practices in the internal organization and functioning of political parties, focusing on four consolidated democracies: Germany, Sweden, Canada, and New Zealand. Using a theoretical and institutional framework, the study identifies the core dimensions of good party governance—intra-party democracy, procedural transparency, financial ethics, and public accountability—and examines how these principles are implemented and sustained in different national contexts. Germany exemplifies strong legal regulation and federal decentralization; Sweden highlights the normative power of civic trust and gender equality; Canada combines professionalization with legislated ethical standards; and New Zealand demonstrates the transformative potential of digitalization for civic participation and institutional accountability. The article concludes with a set of lessons and recommendations applicable to Romania and other Eastern European democracies, arguing that a context-sensitive adaptation of these models can contribute to rebuilding public trust and strengthening democratic infrastructures. More than a technical exercise, party reform is framed as a normative and institutional project essential to the future credibility of democratic politics in the region.

• Details
• Contents