Mental Health in Romania: The Legislative Framework Between Normative Progress and Systemic Dysfunctions
Mental Health in Romania: The Legislative Framework Between Normative Progress and Systemic Dysfunctions
Author(s): Corina FusareaSubject(s): Social Sciences, Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Psychology, Civil Law, Individual Psychology, Social psychology and group interaction
Published by: Ediktura Beladi
Keywords: mental health policy; Romanian legislation; patient rights; psychiatric reform; systemic dysfunctions;
Summary/Abstract: This article offers an in-depth and critical examination of Romania’s legal framework on mental health, centering on Law no. 487/2002 concerning mental health and the protection of persons with mental disorders. While the legislation aligns nominally with European and international standards—enshrining the principles of patient autonomy, informed consent, non-discrimination, and legal safeguards against involuntary treatment—its implementation reveals a stark divergence between normative aspiration and institutional reality.The study traces this tension by unpacking not only the structure of the law, but also the systemic dysfunctions that compromise its effectiveness: chronic underfunding of psychiatric services, acute shortages of trained professionals, outdated infrastructure, and the persistence of bureaucratic opacity. A key contribution of the article lies in framing social stigma as an institutionalized constraint, rather than merely a cultural residue. The analysis shows how legal safeguards are often undermined by structural inertia, lack of intersectoral coordination, and the failure to operationalize patient rights in clinical practice. This research is particularly relevant for international scholars, NGOs, and policymakers seeking to understand the legislative landscape of mental health governance in Eastern Europe. Romania is often cited as a case of legislative progress with limited practical transformation. Despite the law’s progressive spirit— especially in its treatment of involuntary hospitalization, procedural rights, and the involvement of civil society—the psychiatric care system remains fragmented and underperforming. As such, the Romanian case serves as a cautionary example of how modern legislation, in the absence of systemic reform and political will, may become a façade masking enduring inequalities and violations of patient dignity.
Journal: Revista Universitară de Sociologie
- Issue Year: XXI/2025
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 179-188
- Page Count: 10
- Language: English
