Kant, racism, and environmental determinism
Kant, racism, and environmental determinism

Summary/Abstract: This article evaluates the positions Kant took in his works on race that have been used to argue that Kant developed a racist theory of race and hence also shared a racist ideology. In doing so, we will demonstrate that he was in fact theorizing as a natural scientist [Naturforscher] engaging in the science of natural history and heredity (which today is encompassed by the field of genetics). Kant was a proto-geneticist doing legitimate science and not attempting to prove that there was a hierarchy of races. This article concludes that Kant’s articles on natural history and heredity cannot be used to establish he was a racist nor that he shared an ideology of racism. This article builds on Kant’s arguments in his four articles on natural history to show that some of the statements he made that appear to be racist are in fact applications of the principles of heredity to human behavior. Our position is that Kant referred to these essays as concerned with the concept of race, but his main focus was not on designating populations in terms of racial identity to stigmatize them and create a hierarchy, but rather on defining race on the basis of the unfailing heritability of skin color. He then explored incidentally whether he could extend the concept of heritability to explain human behavior. We conclude that it is important to define what we mean by racism and that it is also important to interpret Kant within his own context while putting our own biases in brackets.

• Details
• Contents