AI AND RISKS IN JUDICIAL ACTIVITY
AI AND RISKS IN JUDICIAL ACTIVITY
Author(s): Marius George MaraSubject(s): Economy, Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, ICT Information and Communications Technologies
Published by: Editura Pro Universitaria
Keywords: AI Act; fundamental rights; fair trial; rule of law; judicial; CEPEJ;
Summary/Abstract: This article examines the civil liability implications arising from damages to fundamental rights caused by artificial intelligence systems under the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU)2024/1689). Complementing GDPR accountability mechanisms and CJEU jurisprudence on algorithmic transparency (Schufa C-634/21; Dun & Bradstreet C-203/22), the study underscores the necessity of contestable, explainable AI in judicial contexts to preserve human autonomy and rule-of-law integrity. It concludes that coherent national transposition, integrating CEPEJ ethical principles and CAI Convention safe guards, is essential to balance technological innovation with robust protection of fundamental rights.
Journal: Annales Universitatis Apulensis - Series Jurisprudentia
- Issue Year: 2025
- Issue No: 28
- Page Range: 181-192
- Page Count: 11
- Language: English
