Turkish Language Teachers’ Perspectives on Writing Instruction: Practices, Challenges, and Solutions Cover Image

Türkçe Öğretmenlerinin Gözünden Yazma Eğitimi: Uygulamalar, Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri
Turkish Language Teachers’ Perspectives on Writing Instruction: Practices, Challenges, and Solutions

Author(s): Serkan Aslan, Yeliz Akın
Subject(s): Language studies, Foreign languages learning, Phonetics / Phonology, Turkic languages
Published by: T.C. MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ
Keywords: Writing training; Writing skills; Phonemology;

Summary/Abstract: Writing is a complex, multidimensional cognitive and metacognitive process whereby individuals not only convey their emotions, thoughts, and knowledge, but also engage in higher-order thinking such as critical analyses, reasoning, problem solving, and creativity. In educational contexts, particularly at the middle school level, writing instruction plays a pivotal role in shaping students’ academic trajectories and cognitive development. Despite its importance, writing education in Turkish middle schools has often been criticized due to its emphasis on end products rather than on the writing process itself. Such an approach sidelines essential components such as planning, revising, and reflection, thereby restricting students’ ability to engage deeply with written expressions. To address this pedagogical gap, the aim of the present study was to investigate Turkish language teachers’ perceptions, instructional practices, and the systemic and contextual challenges that they encounter in the domain of writing instruction. Actionable recommendations to enhance the quality of writing pedagogy in middle school settings are also proposed. A qualitative research design based on descriptive phenomenology was used to capture teachers’ lived experiences and professional insights in this research. The study was conducted with 10 Turkish language teachers who had at least 10 years of professional experience and who were employed at public middle schools. The participants were selected via criterion sampling to ensure their expertise and depth of insight. The data were collected via semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using an inductive content analysis facilitated by In Vivo coding. The analysis followed a systematic process that involved open coding, categorization, and thematic abstraction. Strategies such as expert validation, pilot testing, thick descriptions with direct quotations, and audit trails were implemented throughout the research process to ensure the rigor of the study. The findings revealed that teachers predominantly conceptualized writing as “expressing feelings and thoughts in written form.” From the teachers’ perspectives, key student-related challenges included insufficient reading habits, limited vocabulary repertoire, difficulty translating thoughts into written language, and a general reluctance to engage in writing tasks. In response, the teachers employed a range of instructional strategies, such as encouraging extensive reading, allocating more instructional time to writing, integrating collaborative writing activities, and implementing motivational support. Frequently reported classroom practices encompassed guided writing, text completion, group-based composition, and creative writing exercises. However, assessment practices were mainly confined to traditional methods such as summative evaluations and rubricbased scoring, with minimal use of formative or alternative tools such as peer assessment or students’ self-reflection. Moreover, extrinsic barriers, including parental disinterest, lack of institutional support, scarcity of instructional resources, and pervasive digital distractions, were found to further impede students’ writing development. Overall, the study highlighted the multidimensional nature of writing instruction and the interplay of pedagogical, institutional, and socioenvironmental factors. Enhancing middle school students’ writing proficiency requires systemic reforms that include embedding process-based instructional approaches, enriching teacher-training programs with writing pedagogy, and diversifying assessment mechanisms to promote metacognitive engagement. The findings also indicated the need for strengthened collaboration between schools and families, as well as curricular and structural reforms aimed at reducing time constraints and curriculum overload. This study provides both theoretical contributions and practical implications for improving writing instruction by presenting contextually grounded insights from the field, and emphasizes the urgency of rethinking teacher preparation, classroom strategies, and systemic support structures to increase the status and effectiveness of writing education in middle schools.

  • Issue Year: 11/2025
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 541-580
  • Page Count: 40
  • Language: Turkish
Toggle Accessibility Mode