RESPONSABILITATEA MEDICULUI ÎNTRE OBLIGAŢIA DE A ŞTI ŞI OBLIGAŢIA DE A EXPLICA
DOCTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY, BETWEEN DUTY TO KNOW AND DUTY TO EXPLAIN

Summary/Abstract: In the context of the medical profession, a clear definition of the legal obligations incumbent upon physicians is essential both for the protection of patients and for the legal defense of physicians in the event of a dispute. Among these obligations, two categories stand out: the duty of care, which reflects the professional standard in the therapeutic act, and the duty to inform, consistently classified as an obligation of result. Understanding the legal nature of these obligations is not just a theoretical requirement, but a practical necessity, since this distinction also determines the burden of proof and the content of civil liability in cases of alleged malpractice. The doctor is not liable for the absence of a result, but for the lack of conduct in accordance with the level of competence and prudence required by the profession, and with regard to patient information, effective proof of clear and comprehensible communication of medical risks and alternatives is required. In order to better outline the theoretical and practical framework of the professional obligations of doctors, we have taken a brief look at how this issue is addressed in several European legal systems. Although national particularities cannot be ignored, the conclusion that emerges is that there is a unity of vision regarding the distinction between the duty of care and the duty to inform, the latter being qualified as an obligation of result and the burden of proof in the event of a dispute. This convergence between the regulations and case law of countries such as France, Italy, and Spain confirms that today's doctors can no longer be strictly technical professionals, but must strengthen their legal culture and understand the responsibilities that derive from their status and the vulnerable position of patients in the therapeutic relationship.

• Details
• Contents