POJĘCIA: „NORMALNE WYNAGRODZENIE” ORAZ „WYNAGRODZENIE PRACOWNIKA WYNIKAJĄCE Z JEGO OSOBISTEGO ZASZEREGOWANIA OKREŚLONEGO STAWKĄ GODZINOWĄ LUB MIESIĘCZNĄ” W ROZUMIENIU ART. 151(1) § 1 I 3 K.P. W ŚWIETLE ORZECZNICTWA SĄDU NAJWYŻSZEGO ORAZ POGLĄDÓW DOKT
CONCEPT OF ‘REGULAR REMUNERATION’ AND ‘EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION’ RESULTING FROM PERSONAL WAGE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON AN HOURLY OR MONTHLY RATE WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 151¹ §§ 1 AND 3 LC IN THE LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT CASE LAW AND EMPLOYMENT LA

Summary/Abstract: The article discusses the principles of calculating remuneration for overtime work under thePolish Labour Code and in light of recent Supreme Court case law. The author analysesthe dual structure of compensation for overtime work: regular remuneration and theovertime supplement, highlighting their distinct legal and economic functions. Particularattention is paid to the question of which remuneration components may be included as partof ‘regular remuneration’ within the meaning of Article 151¹ § 1 of the Labour Code. Thearticle also includes de lege ferenda proposals, advocating for a statutory definition of ‘regularremuneration’ to enhance transparency and ensure the adequacy of the remuneration system.

• Details
• Contents