Public intelligence as a strategic tool: The
role of real-time intelligence disclosure in
the Ukraine War Cover Image

Public intelligence as a strategic tool: The role of real-time intelligence disclosure in the Ukraine War
Public intelligence as a strategic tool: The role of real-time intelligence disclosure in the Ukraine War

Author(s): Alfred Marleku
Subject(s): Peace and Conflict Studies, Russian Aggression against Ukraine, Russian war against Ukraine
Published by: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
Keywords: foreign policy; Russia-Ukraine War; public intelligence; strategic disclosure; intelligence transparency;

Summary/Abstract: This paper aims to analyse the role of public intelligence as a strategic tool in modern conflicts, focusing on its use during the Russo-Ukrainian war. It employs a qualitative research design, combining comparative case analysis and document analysis to examine therole of public intelligence as a strategic tool in the Ukraine War. The primary data sources include declassified intelligence reports,official government statements, media coverage, and academic literature on intelligence disclosure and strategic communication. Thefindings of this study indicate that public intelligence disclosure in the Ukraine War has been highly effective in countering Russiandisinformation and strengthening diplomatic cohesion among Western allies. Unlike previous conflicts, intelligence transparency playeda crucial role in shaping global narratives and mobilising international support. However, its deterrence value remains uncertain, asintelligence disclosures did not prevent Russia’s full-scale invasion. The findings of this paper highlight how intelligence disseminationhas shifted from classified circles to a public tool of strategic statecraft. The Ukraine War marked a departure from traditionalintelligence practices, as the United States and the United Kingdom used real-time declassification to counter Russian disinformation,unify allies, and shape global opinion. This shift underscores both opportunities and limitations, as intelligence transparency did notdeter Russia’s invasion. Public intelligence disclosures proved effective in neutralising misinformation and influencing diplomaticresponses. Intelligence disclosure also had diplomatic ramifications. While it helped rally allies, initial scepticism from Germany andFrance revealed lingering distrust due to past intelligence failures.

  • Issue Year: 50/2025
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 50-65
  • Page Count: 16
  • Language: Ukrainian
Toggle Accessibility Mode