Previzibilitatea noţiunii de „măsuri de prevedere” în cazul infracţiunilor de ucidere din culpă şi vătămare corporală din culpă
The predictability of the notion of "preventive measures" in the case of the crimes of manslaughter and culpable bodily harm

Summary/Abstract: This article aims to analyze to what extent the notion of precautionary measures is nevertheless a predictable one in the context in which this aspect has been discussed countless times in the form of invoking some exceptions of unconstitutionality that were rejected by the Constitutional Court. Especially in the context of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court no. 405/2016 regarding the crime of abuse of office, respectively no. 518/2017 regarding the crime of negligence in the service, the question arises whether the defendants can be sentenced in compliance with the constitutional provisions for the aggravated version of the so-called "professional fault" if they have violated provisions contained in norms below the law, contained even in files of post, internal order regulations, various ministerial orders or Government decisions.

• Details
• Contents