L’AFFAIRE FU QUAN S.R.O. C. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE : LE POSITIONNEMENT DE LA GRANDE CHAMBRE CALQUÉ SUR L’OPINION DISSIDENTE DES JUGES DE CHAMBRE
THE CASE OF FU QUAN S.R.O. V. THE CZECH REPUBLIC: THE GRAND CHAMBER’S POSITION BASED ON THE DISSENTING OPINION OF THE CHAMBER JUDGES
Author(s): Elisa Gomes SemedoSubject(s): Civil Law, Law on Economics, Sociology of Law, Court case
Published by: INSTITUT LOUIS FAVOREU
Keywords: Right to property; Article 1 of Protocol No 1 to the ECHR; claim for compensation; Chamber judgment; Grand Chamber judgment; dissenting opinion;
Summary/Abstract: This study concerns a case heard by the Grand Chamber, between the Czech Republic and a company which was claiming compensation for the financial damage suffered because of the unlawful detention of its directors. While the company was successful in the judgment delivered by the Chamber, the Grand Chamber, seized at the request of the respondent State, found the application inadmissible, choosing to follow the opinion set out in the dissenting opinion led by two minority judges.
Journal: LETTRE DE L’EST
- Issue Year: 2024
- Issue No: 36
- Page Range: 51-56
- Page Count: 6
- Language: French
