Certain Questions of the Judicial Liability in a Legal Historian Perspective
Certain Questions of the Judicial Liability in a Legal Historian Perspective
Author(s): Boglárka Lilla SchlachtaSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Public Administration, Public Law, Court case
Published by: Partiumi Keresztény Egyetem
Keywords: judicial profession; liability of the judges; disciplinary liability of the judges; relocation of the judges
Summary/Abstract: The study focuses on the analysis of the judicial liability in the perspective of legal history from 1936 to 1954 in Hungary. During the indicated time period the disciplinary liability of the judges was regulated by the Act III of 1936. The forthcoming regulation reflecting the zeitgeist was Act XXII of 1948 introducing changes to liability of the judges. Subsequently the framework of the disciplinary proceedings was laid down by Act II of 1954 and the detailed rules was declared by the Council of Ministers of the Hungarian People's Republic decree 1.051/1954 (VI. 30.). Act III of 1936 and Act II of 1954 are the results of two political eras which are significantly different in content, and this study focuses on these differences.
Journal: Acta Universitatis Christianae Partiensis. Studia culturale
- Issue Year: 2023
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 31-39
- Page Count: 9
- Language: English
