SOME CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE LIMITS AND CRITICISM OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE STATE
SOME CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE LIMITS AND CRITICISM OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE STATE

Summary/Abstract: The principle of separation of powers constituted the basis of the state organization of all bourgeois states, it being explicitly or implicitly enshrined in the constitutions of these states. From a political point of view, the principle of the separation of powers was considered a generator of political freedoms through the balance and collaboration of the separate powers as competences necessarily belonging to the constitutional state, where the dignity of the person is ensured and where there is "the rule of law." As specified in the doctrine, the separation of powers in the state does not exclude their collaboration. Thus, on an organic level, ministers can be parliamentarians and are responsible before the parliament. Functionally, each party is charged with the main title of a function, but participates equally in the function exercised by the other. The parliament and the government exert a constant reciprocal action on each other. They collaborate in an intimate manner in the implementation of the general activity of the state, but they collaborate in different forms in the same cause of structural diversity.

• Details
• Contents