Differences in emotion regulation along the eating disorder spectrum: cross sectional study in adolescents out patient care
Differences in emotion regulation along the eating disorder spectrum: cross sectional study in adolescents out patient care
Author(s): Alina Segal, Moria GolanSubject(s): Individual Psychology, Behaviorism, Health and medicine and law
Published by: MedCrave Group Kft.
Keywords: emotion regulation; eating disorder; adolescents;
Summary/Abstract: Background: Emotion-regulation (ER) difficulties among individuals with eating disorders (EDs) are thought to contribute to the development and maintenance of eating disorders. Aims: The present study explores the differences in ER difficulties along the eating disorders spectrum, to reveal the basing emotional mechanism in each subtype. Method: In this case-control study, 91 girls, aged 11–18, diagnosed with eating disorders (EDs) according to DSM-V (35 ANRT, 29 ANBP, and 27 BN) were compared to 41 agematched healthy controls (HC). Comparisons between the following ER dimensions were performed: alexithymia, anxiety, depression, DERS’s components: Awareness and clarity of emotional states; acceptance of emotional distress; ability to engage in goal directed behavior and refrain from impulsive behavior as well as access to appropriate strategies that are perceived as effective to modulate the duration and/or intensity of emotional responses. Results: The overall level of eating pathology was similar in BN and ANBP and higher than the ANRT group (p< 0.001). The ANBP group reported significant higher level of alexithymia and depressive symptoms than the ANRT group and similar to the BN group (p< 0.001). The anxiety levels of all patient groups were similar and higher in comparison to the HC (p< 0.001). ANRT group presented significantly higher levels of alexithymia, depressive symptoms, anxiety and impulse control in comparison to HC (p< 0.001) and significantly lower levels of alexithymia, depressive symptoms, and impulse control in comparison to ANBP (p< 0.001). ANBP reported greater ER significant difficulties than ANRT (p< 0.001) indicated by greater DERS total scores and DERS subscale scores nonacceptance, clarity and impulse control. ANBP and BN did not differ from each other on the DERS total score. Conclusion: ANBP and BN seem to be originated from combination of defects in the emotional regulation as well as the impulse regulation system and both should be targeted during treatment.
Journal: Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry
- Issue Year: 6/2016
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 1-8
- Page Count: 8
- Language: English
