ПОЕТИЧНИЙ СИНТАКСИС ВІРШОВАНИХ ТВОРІВ СИДОРА ВОРОБКЕВИЧА ОСТАННЬОГО ПЕРІОДУ ТВОРЧОСТІ (1876-1903)
POETIC SYNTAX OF SYDOR VOROBKEVYCH’S POETIC WORKS OF THE LAST PERIOD OF HIS CREATIVITY (1876-1903)
Author(s): Tetyana Nykyforuk, Oleksandr RAKSubject(s): Ukrainian Literature, Theory of Literature, Sociology of Literature
Published by: Видавництво ВДНЗ України « Буковинський державний медичний університет »
Keywords: S. Vorobkevych; poetics; poetic syntax; rhetorical questions; inversion; antithesis; enzhambeman; ellipsis; figurative parallelism; anadiplosis; asiadeton; polysindecton; pleonamism; anastrophe;
Summary/Abstract: An important role in the expression of Sydor Vorobkevich’s poetic language is played by syntactic means. Goal. To investigate the functioning of poetic syntax in the poetic works of Sydor Vorobkevich of the third period of creativity (1876-1903). Research methods are predetermined by the purpose and tasks of the work, the object of research and are complex. The hermeneutic method and the method of slow reading (the method of receptive poetics) were practiced, aimed to reveal S. Vorobkevych artistic means, interpret his works. Formal method based on the use of statistics, quantitative processing of the material, aimed to analyze the aspects of versifi cation, has been applied. Particular attention should be paid to the,, frequency coeffi cient» principle (FC), which is the ratio of the poetic element to the number of lines and was practiced in the works of V. Pivtorak, O. Romanytsya and R. Pazyuk. This approach made it possible to obtain objective conclusions regarding the various components of poetry of the writer. Scientifi c novelty. For the first time in Ukrainian literary studies, a comprehensive study of the poetics of S. Vorobkevych’s poetic works was carried out; they are analyzed in terms of poetic syntax. Conclusions. Syntactic means play an important role in understanding of the poetic language of the artist. Repetitions, among which the anaphores dominate are the ingredients of poetic syntax. Mostly, its use falls on the third period of creativity of the poet (FC – 0,04). Since this period is the most rich in creativity achievements, we will show the dynamics of several more fi gures: the refrain (I period – 0.002, ІІ – 0.001, ІІІ – 0.002), the take-up (І period – 0.002, ІІ – 0.008, ІІІ – 0.008), condilk (І period – 0,005, ІІ – 0,005, ІІІ – 0,01). The selection of stylistic fi gures in S. Vorobkevyh works is quite rich. In rhymed poetry, Rhetorical questions, inversion, antithesis, enzhambeman, ellipsis, fi gurative parallelism, anadiplosis, asiadeton, polysindecton, pleonamism, anastrophe, likasaprene, polyptot, imprecation, climax, symposium etc. were practiced by Bykovynian poet.
Journal: Актуальні питання суспільних наук та історії медицини
- Issue Year: 2023
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 90-93
- Page Count: 4
- Language: Ukrainian
