ROMAN STOICS SENECA AND EPICTETUS ON EPICUREAN HEDONISM AND THE SOCIAL ROLES OF PHILOSOPHERS Cover Image

RIMSKI STOICI SENEKA I EPIKTET O EPIKUREJSKOM HEDONIZMU I DRUŠTVENIM ULOGAMA FILOZOFA
ROMAN STOICS SENECA AND EPICTETUS ON EPICUREAN HEDONISM AND THE SOCIAL ROLES OF PHILOSOPHERS

Author(s): Tamara Plećaš, Ivan Nišavić
Subject(s): Ethics / Practical Philosophy, Political Philosophy, Social Philosophy, Ancient Philosphy
Published by: Filozofsko društvo Srbije
Keywords: Epicurus; Seneca; Epictetus; moral virtue; pleasure; political activism; marriage; friendship;

Summary/Abstract: Epicureans and Roman Stoics interpreted pleasure (ἡδονή) differently from each other: for the Epicureans, pleasure was the ultimate good, while most Stoics perceived pleasure as something indifferent. This difference in understanding of pleasure is the crucial point of a disagreement between these two Hellenistic schools of philosophy, in particular if we consider their ethics. This paper examines this difference and highlights the significant similarities between the Roman Stoic and the Epicurean positions. Further, it briefly explores the Epicurean and the Roman Stoic understanding of social relations and philosophers’ role in politics and society.

  • Issue Year: 65/2022
  • Issue No: 3
  • Page Range: 5-19
  • Page Count: 15
  • Language: Serbian