A multidisciplinary perspective on the knowledge economy and society
A multidisciplinary perspective on the knowledge economy and society

Summary/Abstract: RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The skilful acquisition and use of available knowled­ge resources can be a factor in increasing the effectiveness of management processes. It directly influences the level and effectiveness of priorities. The aim of this article is a comparative study of the existing relevant literature with a multidisciplinary perspective on aspects of the knowledge economy and society. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The data presented in the article are based on a relevant literature review (both book and article publications) and provides a spectrum of comparisons of views, theories and publications from the fields of organisational forms, knowledge models and KM, as well as the social dimension of qualitative modelling theory. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The time of being the best is over. The era of being exceptional has begun. It is through the skills, knowledge and competences of employees as key elements influencing development that a competitive advantage can be secured. Knowledge is seen as a strategically important resource in this aspect. RESEARCH RESULTS: The results provide a review of the achievements in individual fields, as well as selective task and function areas in the academic dimension. Particular attention was paid to the perception of the issue of qualitology (1970s). Models of knowledge management KM, social capital are juxtaposed, and the importance of the socio-economic influences observed in terms of the behaviour, expectations and choices of a modern society (often referred to as a consumer society) is highlighted. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the relatively short period in which the described issues have functioned, any results and research attempts made in this area are interesting and valuable. Particularly cross-sectional works, which enable a clear compilation of the progress of individual theories against economic practice and the possibility of determining the future direction of their development.

• Details
• Contents