JURISPRUDENŢA INSTANTELOR ROMANE ÎN UNELE CAUZE ÎN CARE AU SESIZAT CJUE CU ÎNTREBĂRI PRELIMINARE (Cauzele C‑133/17 și C‑134/17, C‑12/17şi C‑614/15)
THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE ROMANIAN COURTS IN SELECTED CASES IN WHICH THEY SUBMITTED PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS TO THE CJEU (Cases C‑133/17 & C‑134/17, C‑12/17 and C‑614/15)

Summary/Abstract: Referral to the CJEU for the pronouncement of preliminary rulings regarding the interpretation of European Union law cannot have a purely theoretical purpose (e.g. the Court Ordinance of October 7, 2013in case C-82/13) but a necessarily practical one, such as to allow the national court to resolve the specific dispute with which it is vested. Therefore, knowledge of the judicial decisions pronounced by the national courts after receiving the answer to the preliminary question from the CJEU is very important to evaluate the implications of the CJEU jurisprudence in the law of the member states and the effectiveness of the dialogue between it and the national courts. Next, the decisions of the courts in Romania are presented in some cases in which the CJEU was referred with preliminary questions, respectively those that were resolved in the cases registered on its roll with no. C-133/17 ?i C-134/17, C-12/17 and C-614/15.

• Details
• Contents