Titu Maiorescu în fața instanței documentelor Partea a III-a „Studiile lui Titu Maiorescu”
Titu Maiorescu in front of the documents court The third party „The studies of Titu Maiorescu”

Summary/Abstract: Tragically for Romanians, there are many, many untruths uttered by Titu Maiorescu and his minions. The present study brings to the attention of the public decades of lies that have been given to us in various ways. The conclusion of this inherently limited article cannot be other than the following: death does not rank the file of any existence and the mere passing of time, even with meritorious personal efforts, is not likely to erase the consequences of a profoundly immoral conduct that has destroyed consciences and destinies in a climate of insecurity and terror as in the case of the assassination of Mihai Eminescu or the foreign occupation of the country during the First World War. And here we have in mind two fundamental features of man that have never come under the jurisdiction of laws – common sense and honor. The honor of keeping your word, the honor of what you have done, the honor of taking responsibility for your deeds and words. The free man is a man of honor, who obeys only his conscience, while the servant man obeys what his master commands, because he has sold his conscience to the master, so the mentality of pleasing those who have power dishonors him . This human construction that was Titu Maiorescu perfectly meets the above criteria. If we add the fact that our "hero" has not completed any higher education system, we have the complete picture of the greed of the liar, traitor and murderer. I have used a mild phrase, but I state at the outset that I cannot now speak of all that I know, think, or feel on this matter. It is neither the moment nor the historical time has yet come. I haven't had any criticism from anyone except an unfortunate suggestion "to be careful we have children". Instead, almost from the beginning of my studies I was bombarded with many studies and materials about Eminescu. I assumed that only my membership, military-juridical, was the big problem, that, probably, I was a stain on the splendid yellow painting of the words about the real Titu Maiorescu. I still do not completely understand today what led the "protector" to put pressure on Eminescu, at a newspaper where he had a lot of work anyway. In addition, I don't even think about why I would have had a part from the "sources" if I had written more about Maiorescu's membership in Freemasonry and their role in Eminescu's assassination. Finally, I have other interpretations for this situation, but it is not yet time to tell them. I think that the geopolitical situation that Romania is going through in the last year requires a different approach for projects regarding national security and defense.

• Details
• Contents