STRATEGIES OF DEFENDING THEISM AGAINST THE ACCUSATION OF THE HIDDENNESS: A REPLY TO DISCUSSANTS Cover Image

STRATEGIE OBRONY TEIZMU PRZED ZARZUTEM UKRYTOŚCI BOGA. ODPOWIEDŹ DYSKUTANTOM
STRATEGIES OF DEFENDING THEISM AGAINST THE ACCUSATION OF THE HIDDENNESS: A REPLY TO DISCUSSANTS

Author(s): Marek Dobrzeniecki
Subject(s): Contemporary Philosophy, Philosophy of Religion, Sociology of Religion
Published by: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL & Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Keywords: hiddenness; the hiddenness arugment; the incarnational response; theism; Schellenberg;

Summary/Abstract: The article is a response to the critical comments by Stanisław Judycki, Ryszard Mordarski, Marek Pepliński and Jan Sochoń on the book Ukrytość i Wcielenie. Teistyczna odpowiedź na argument Johna L. Schellenberga za nieistnieniem Boga [Hiddenness and the Incarnation: A Theistic Response to John L. Schellenberg’s Argument for Divine Nonexistence]. The main objection to my position is that it is too favorable to J. L. Schellenberg’s argument, which should not necessarily be a model for addressing the issue of the divine hiddenness. One of the expressions of accepting the assumptions of the Canadian author is my acceptance of the proposition affirming the existence of non-resistant nonbelievers.

  • Issue Year: 71/2023
  • Issue No: 1
  • Page Range: 491-499
  • Page Count: 9
  • Language: Polish