Criticism of John Stuart Mill’s Empiricism in the Philosophical Work of P. P. Negulescu Cover Image

Critica empirismului lui John Stuart Mill în opera filosofică a lui P. P. Negulescu
Criticism of John Stuart Mill’s Empiricism in the Philosophical Work of P. P. Negulescu

Author(s): Constantin Stoenescu
Subject(s): Epistemology, 19th Century Philosophy
Published by: Editura Academiei Române
Keywords: P. P. Negulescu; John St. Mill; Herbert Spencer; methodological phenomenalism; sources of knowledge; external world;

Summary/Abstract: The Romanian philosopher P.P. Negulescu, in his work “Critique of Apriorism and Empiricism”, published in 1892, undertakes a critique of Kantian apriorism and the radical empiricism of John St. Mill. The present study analyses the criticism of Mill’s phenomenalism and reconstructs the main objections formulated by Negulescu starting from some of the philosophers with authority in that time, such as Herbert Spencer. Negulescu proposes the distinction between problems of fact and problems of justification in the analysis of knowledge and subjects Mill’s methodological phenomenalism, especially the problem of a belief in an external world, discussed by him in the book on Hamilton, to a severe critique, open to current problematizations, such as the distinction between conceivability and epistemic acceptability.

  • Issue Year: LXIX/2022
  • Issue No: 6
  • Page Range: 747-759
  • Page Count: 13
  • Language: Romanian