CZY ORZECZENIA LEKARZY ORZECZNIKÓW ZAKŁADU UBEZPIECZEŃ SPOŁECZNYCH O ZWIĄZKU CHOROBY, POWODUJĄCEJ CZASOWĄ NIEZDOLNOŚĆ DO PRACY, ZE SZCZEGÓLNYMI WŁAŚCIWOŚCIAMI LUB WARUNKAMI WYKONYWANIA CZYNNOŚCI SĘDZIEGO PODLEGAJĄ NADZOROWI PREZESA ZUS?
ARE THE JUDGMENTS OF THE SOCIAL INSURANCE INSTITUTION ADJUDICATORS RELATING TO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A DISEASE CAUSING TEMPORARY INABILITY TO WORK, WITH SPECIFIC PROPERTIES OR CONDITIONS FOR PERFORMING THE DUTIES OF A JUDGE, SUBJECT TO THE...

Summary/Abstract: The subject contained in the article concerns emerging problems with the interpretation of art. 94 of the Act of 27 July 2001. Law on the system of general courts, as well as the possibility of checking the correctness of the judgments of the doctors of the Social Insurance Institution by the President of ZUS, in medical supervision mode from art. 14 par. 5 of the Act of 17 December 1998. About pensions and pensions from FUS. The scope of the activities of the Social Security Insurance Institute doctors and medical committees should include Determining whether the disease causing temporary inability to work on the judge was created in relation to special properties or conditions for performing activities. However, the Act of 27 July 2001. Law on the system of general courts in art. 94 (1) gives the opportunity to oppose the judgment of the Soczem Doctor within 14 days only the judge. In the opinion of the author of the article, the provisions of the law on the system of universal courts are not complete regulation. Supplementary roles perform the provisions of art. 71 and art. 73 of the Act of 13 October 1998. About the Social Insurance System, regulating the powers of the ZUS and the President of ZUS. They are the authority to control the judgments of the Social Adjustors, issued to judges in terms of their regularity.

• Details
• Contents