Sfera și conținutul noțiunilor la Ion Petrovici și Edmond Goblot: o inadvertență istoriografică
Extension and intension of concepts in Ion Petrovici and Edmond Goblot: An inadvertence of historians
Author(s): Ovidiu G. GramaSubject(s): Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Logic
Published by: Editura Academiei Române
Keywords: law of inverse variation of extension and intension; connotation; comprehension; concept; idea; static and dynamic perspectives; historical priority; Petre Andrei; Ion Petrovici; Edmond Goblot;
Summary/Abstract: The paper tries to identify the imperfections of a small book review from 1920, which had a disproportionate impact on subsequent Romanian philosophical historiography. The review in question is signed by Petre Andrei; he points to a parallel between certain novel ideas of the logicians Ion Petrovici and Edmond Goblot, drawing attention to the complete similarity of their conceptions and the priority that the former would have over the latter regarding their thoughts on the relationship between the intension and the extension of logical concepts. But the ideas were not so novel, the similarity was not so complete, and the priority did not exist, or at least this is what I will try to establish.
Journal: Studii de istorie a filosofiei româneşti
- Issue Year: XVIII/2022
- Issue No: 18
- Page Range: 101-110
- Page Count: 10
- Language: Romanian