ПОЛИТИЧКЕ ИНСТИТУЦИЈЕ И САМОУПРАВЉАЊЕ
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND SELF-MANAGEMENT

Summary/Abstract: The starting point of the title reads: there have been established many relations between self-management and political institutions which science has not yet researched enough and which are very complex, particularly when having in mind the contradictory relations —_ political institutions are withering away while self-management is developing and getting stronger. Self-management which is getting stronger cannot, for the time being, do without the assistance of political institutions, and political institution are not only stimulating political institutions, but are frequently an obstacle to self-management. The revolution is to be most merited for the constitution of such complex relations between political institutions and self-management. This can be expressed by a hypothesis that was a topic in this article and which reads: for what the socialist revolution is a political revolution (which is predominantly so) for that is the political side developed while the social side undeveloped. Because of this, there will be, and for a longer period remain, an accented, sometimes even an over accented, social function and role of political institutions. The transformation of a political into a social revolution causes the transformation of political into-social institutions. All this raised an analytical question which reads: to what degree, on which points and in which way and by means of which institutions and instruments will political institutions stimulate self-management, self-management processes and self-management institutions as an alternative to political institutions. Haw and in which segments establish and hold the relations between political institutions and seff- -management? There exist some segments of social reality in which there are established complex, frequently also incidental relations between political institutions and self-management, such as the segment and field of political orientation and socialization of the citizens, the field of protecting and self-protecting socialist and in them political values of self-management socialism and the field of achieving accord in political interests. In all this the role of violence is an attractive question — the role of administrative and other, the violence of the personal example which the Communers of Paris used.

• Details
• Contents