Specific Characteristics of the Reception of Criminal Justice in Lithuanian Society Cover Image

Kriminalinės justicijos recepcijos Lietuvos visuomenėje ypatumai
Specific Characteristics of the Reception of Criminal Justice in Lithuanian Society

Author(s): Vincentas Giedraitis, Aleksandras Dobryninas, Margarita Dobrynina, Ilona Čėsnienė, Remigijus Merkevijus
Subject(s): Social Sciences
Published by: Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla
Keywords: criminal justice; professional; political and public discourses; mass media

Summary/Abstract: It is suggested that the reader consider an earlier publication by the same authors with a similar theme: “Perceptions of criminal justice in society” (Dobryninas, A., Dobrynina, M., Česnienė, I., Giedraitis, V., Merkevičius, R. “On Perceptions of Criminal Justice in Society.” Sociologija: Mintis ir veiksmas. 2012. Issue 2. pg. 222–238). This article empirically illustrates how criminal justice principles are used to understand different social groups’ perspectives, what are the similarities and differences between these groups, how the intergroup communications about criminal justice issues form, and so on. The authors analyzed and summarized qualitative data (focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews with Lithuanian criminal justice experts, politicians, journalists, community leaders) and quantitative data (using a Lithuanian representative survey of the population and Lithuanian mass media content analy¬sis), which was collected during 2012–2014. The first chapter is devoted to the social normative perceptions of criminal justice, the second – the economic and political aspects which influenced the understanding of criminal justice in society, and the third chapter – examines the influence of mass media on the Lithuanian Criminal Justice system’s public image. It is concluded that a consensus on the implementation of the prin¬ciples of criminal justice among different groups is possible only in part. While the needs are the same as the criminal justice system, decisions must be impartial, objective, humane, equal for all, but how to achieve such a consensus of opinions is very divided. The study participants indicated a variety of reasons that impede the achievement of a mutual understanding: financial constraints, lack of inter-institutional cooperation, party or individual interests take precedence over the interests of society, the role of the media and so on. It is also proposed to improve the current situation in the organization and promotion of communication and alignment of interest between different social groups that have to be done in cooperation with the mass media and other governmental and nongovernmental institutions.

  • Issue Year: 2013
  • Issue No: 02
  • Page Range: 239-264
  • Page Count: 26
  • Language: Lithuanian