Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.
  • Log In
  • Register
CEEOL Logo
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • SUBJECT AREAS
  • PUBLISHERS
  • JOURNALS
  • eBooks
  • GREY LITERATURE
  • CEEOL-DIGITS
  • INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT
  • Help
  • Contact
  • for LIBRARIANS
  • for PUBLISHERS

Content Type

Subjects

Languages

Legend

  • Journal
  • Article
  • Book
  • Chapter
  • Open Access
  • History
  • Special Historiographies:
  • Wars in Jugoslavia

We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our 300.000+ articles is in progress, you might get unsufficient or no results on your third level or second level search. In this case, please broaden your search criteria.

Result 321-340 of 1221
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • ...
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • Next
AMERIČKA JAVNOST I 27. MART 1941. U JUGOSLAVIJI

AMERIČKA JAVNOST I 27. MART 1941. U JUGOSLAVIJI

Author(s): Radoje Nenadović / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 2/1987

The goal of this study is to point out how much was the press and public opinion in the United States interested for the events which took place in the spring of 1941. in Yugoslavia, actually to describe how much sensation have those events - the joining of Yugoslavia with the Tripartite Alliance and the coup d’etat of March 27. - produced in the United States. The articles and documents used in this paper enabled comparison of the American foreign policy with the mood of their public opinion. The titles in American newspapers from that time indicate the growth of interest for the political events in Yugoslavia. American pressing the meaning of a historical source has not been used to the present time in exploring these events. The newspaper articles analysed in this work provide a clear image of the American political strategy in the Balkans, together with a thorough insight in their striving to induce and support the resistance against the Nazi penetration into South-east Europe, and particularly in Yugoslavia. In the need to understand better the writing of the American press about the changes in Yugoslavia, from the moment of joining the Axis to the onset of the April war, this paper includes official Diplomatic papers issued by the U.S. Government Printing Office, considering more important events which occurred immediately before the „March revolution”. As from the beginning of the year 1941., and particularly from the middle of February, American press became more detailed in dealing with the political events in Yugoslavia. American newspapers greeted the coup d’etat of March 27. with enthusiasm, connecting it primarily to the war like and freedom spirited traditions of the Serbian people. Although there were some articles in the American newspapers in which the relations between Yugoslavia and the United States were observed from the Isolationist point of view,the greater part of newspaper material encircled in this work, testifies about a wide support of the American public opinion to the resistance of Yugoslav people against the Nazi aggression. The common attitude of the American public opinion was, in the majority of cases, identical with the official policy of the U.S. government towards Yugoslavia.

More...
UTJECAJ RATA U HRVATSKOJ NA ZBIVANJA U  BOSANSKOJ KRAJINI 1991. GODINE

UTJECAJ RATA U HRVATSKOJ NA ZBIVANJA U BOSANSKOJ KRAJINI 1991. GODINE

Author(s): Jasmin Medić / Language(s): Bosnian,Croatian,Serbian Issue: 2/2019

The author analyzes the impact of war events in Croatia on national relations in the Bosnian Krajina in 1991. The Serbian autonomous region of Krajina (later the Republic of Srpska Krajina) in Croatia and the Autonomous Region of Krajina (ARK) in the northwestern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina were the first to form autonomous areas according to the ethnic principle in the process of the dissolution of Yugoslavia as formal-legal successors of the communities of municipalities. The narrow military and political cooperation, the issue of mobilizing the population of the Bosnian Krajina in the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) and the problem of refugees, significantly influenced national relations in this part of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

More...
Genocid u Srebrenici, genocid u Bosni 11. srpnja 1995.–11. srpnja 2015

Genocid u Srebrenici, genocid u Bosni 11. srpnja 1995.–11. srpnja 2015

Author(s): Rusmir Mahmutćehajić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 1/2018

The crime of genocide against Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica has been bare obviousness. But that's why this crime has been terribly denied. Thus, the perpetrators of the crime seek to intimidate and distract witnesses from the possibility of enlightening the synchronous and diachronical comprehensiveness of the denial and destruction of all Bosnian, the destruction of necessary for making serious the national teleology in which hegemony is a condition of ethnic and religious homogenism.This essay deals with some of the testimonies of genocide against Bosnian Muslims as the essential content of endemic and tabooed anti-Bosnian. It is pointed out on imposed distortion of relations between criminal and his victim: In ordinary ethno-religious narratives, the criminal was turned into a victim and the victim into a criminal. In that way the justice has made impossible, and that means showing and speaking the truth.

More...
Kozarski vjesnik u službi zločina

Kozarski vjesnik u službi zločina

Author(s): Jasmin Medić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 1/2016

In the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia breakup, the political and military structures saw the opportunity for revival of aggressive nationalist policies, at the beginning of its activity they reached for taking control of the media. By means of propaganda writing, journalists who openly stood up for the service of the Great Serbian policy often played the active role in inciting hatred against Bosnian and Croatian people in those parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina which, according to the ideas of the protagonists of this policy, should become part of the mono-ethnic Serbian state. As the media propaganda impact on the general atmosphere in the areas that were considered synonyms of multi-ethnicity was clearly evident in the action of the weekly newspaper "Kozarski vjesnik" in Prijedor. Putting into service of the Great Serbian policy, this journal will become known for the published articles about prominent Prijedor Bosniaks and Croats who were, on false charges detained in one of the three Prijedor concentration camps and then executed. The focus of this paper will be on mentioned articles and the fate of those who were victims of the propaganda of this media.

More...
Przekłady, kanony, przemieszczenia

Przekłady, kanony, przemieszczenia

Author(s): Aleksandra Kremer / Language(s): Polish Issue: 1/2020

The aim of the article is to open up a discussion of Justin Quinn’s book Between Two Fires: Transnationalism and Cold War Poetry. The monograph focuses on transnational movements of poetry between Czech culture and the Anglophone world during the Cold War. The book allows us to reconsider the way in which we study similar transfers of Polish literature and the categories and models we use to describe them, which usually stem from translation studies, studies of reception of Polish literature abroad, and recent debates on world literature.

More...
Response to Josip Glaurdić´s Review
20.00 €
Preview

Response to Josip Glaurdić´s Review

Author(s): Charles Ingrao,Thomas A. Emmert / Language(s): English Issue: 02/2010

We are flattered that EEPS attaches sufficient importance to our edited volume, Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies, to commission an eight-thousand-word review—which is even longer than some of the journal’s full-length articles! Hence our amazement that EEPS would entrust a very junior scholar (PhD, Yale University, 2008) with such a task. Evidently the reviewer has friends in high places or, perhaps, there are scholars in high places who are counting on the reviewer to serve their agenda. Indeed, responding to his criticisms, several of our research team leaders echoed our own view that Dr. Glaurdić’s opus represents the views and encyclopedic knowledge of more than a single, junior scholar. [...]

More...
Response to Ingrao and Emmert
20.00 €
Preview

Response to Ingrao and Emmert

Author(s): Josip Glaurdić / Language(s): English Issue: 02/2010

It may seem odd, but my first reaction to the response by professors Ingrao and Emmert was deep gratitude—gratitude for probably the greatest professional compliment I have ever received. Ingrao and Emmert seem to find it difficult to believe that “the views and encyclopedic knowledge” expressed in my review essay could be truly and only the work of a “single, junior scholar.” I have decided to take those comments of the two senior scholars as compliments, even though they are obviously ad hominem attacks on my personal and academic integrity. After studying Balkan politics for so long, Ingrao and Emmert can be excused for refusing to believe that young men from that region can think independently.

More...
Collective Guilt, Collective Responsibility and the Serbs
20.00 €
Preview

Collective Guilt, Collective Responsibility and the Serbs

Author(s): Janine Natalya Clark / Language(s): English Issue: 03/2008

Can an entire nation be collectively guilty for crimes committed in its name? Focusing on the case of Serbia, this article argues that collective guilt is a morally flawed and untenable concept that should be rejected. It presents various moral and practical objections to both the generic notion of collective guilt and the more specific idea of Serbian collective guilt and contends that the latter is a fundamental impediment to peace-building and reconciliation in the former Yugoslavia. On what basis might it be argued that the Serbs are collectively guilty? To claim that they are collectively guilty for having supported Milošević both exaggerates levels of support for the former Serbian leader and does a major injustice to those individuals who bravely fought against the Milošević regime. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt and Karl Jaspers, the article concludes by suggesting that perhaps we can speak of Serbian collective responsibility.

More...
A Review of One Chapter: An Example of Irresponsible Self-Indulgence
20.00 €
Preview

A Review of One Chapter: An Example of Irresponsible Self-Indulgence

Author(s): Sabrina Petra Ramet / Language(s): English Issue: 01/2007

Robert M. Hayden has written a very strange book review. In my book, Thinking about Yugoslavia, I discuss 131 books, among other things noting differences in factual accounts, interpretations, and moral and empirical frameworks. In his review of my book, Professor Hayden refers to only 7 of the books I discuss and relies on outright falsifications of my views to advance his argument. In fact, nowhere in his review does he demonstrate that any of the works I praise in my book do in fact “violate the principles of social science inquiry,” as he alleges. [...]

More...
Reply to Ramet
20.00 €
Preview

Reply to Ramet

Author(s): Robert M. Hayden / Language(s): English Issue: 01/2007

I would only point out that while Sabrina P. Ramet devotes much of her response to an attack on one of my books, I purposefully avoided dealing in my review with her comments on my own work, on the principle that a review should not be so personalized. I felt very qualified, however, to assess her reviews of others in a field of research to which I have been contributing for more than fifteen years. [...]

More...
Intellectuals as Bad Guys
20.00 €
Preview

Intellectuals as Bad Guys

Author(s): Slavenka Drakulić / Language(s): English Issue: 02/1999

Radovan Karadzic is a notorious war criminal, wanted by the International Court in the Hague. But he is also a psychiatrist and a poet. The world often wonders how it is possible that a poet could turn into a war criminal. This is somehow understandable for a psychiatrist, as it is for a baker, a doctor or a carpenter-but a poet? Edward Limonov is less known than Karadzic, but he also became notorious when he machine-gunned Sarajevo from the hill above the city and drew the attention of the world media. Needless to say, he is also a poet. [...]

More...
Pax Americana. The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and International Diplomacy from the Washington to the Dayton Peace Agreement (18 March 1994 – 21 November 1995)

Pax Americana. The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and International Diplomacy from the Washington to the Dayton Peace Agreement (18 March 1994 – 21 November 1995)

Author(s): Zijad Šehić / Language(s): English Issue: 2/2020

Using relevant literature and diplomatic sources, the author reflects on the plans and activities of the international community to end the war in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the period from the Washington to the Dayton Peace Agreement. Special consideration is devoted to those events that had influenced the shift in US policy and caused its more active engagement. The analysis of international diplomacy and attitudes of various countries towards the developments in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, pointed to the complexity of achieving a peace agreement for which the US had to try out various strategies and seek different solutions. The author pays particular attention to events that had paved the way for a peace agreement, as well as the military and political means that played a key role in achieving peace. Based on the analysis of the provisions and subsequent implementation of the Dayton Peace Agreement, the author believes that the agreement had ended the war, but did not allow the establishment of a functional state because the ideologies that had caused the war continued to live and deepen the divisions in the society of Bosnia and Herzegovina through propaganda and rhetoric. He believes that re-enabling of normal life in the country requires the removal of these structures and the consequences that they have produced and continue to produce, which is why Bosnia and Herzegovina is still waiting for support for its European path. He claims that this could only work if the democratic settings were to be imposed by the international community, since the project of building the institutions was left unfinished. If the international community consistently supports this, the author believes that the path of accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the modern European societies will be much shorter and much faster.

More...
UDRUŽENI ZLOČINAČKI PODUHVAT – BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA U HRVATSKOM VELIKODRŽAVNOM PROJEKTU

UDRUŽENI ZLOČINAČKI PODUHVAT – BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA U HRVATSKOM VELIKODRŽAVNOM PROJEKTU

Author(s): Meldijana Arnaut Haseljić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 4/2020

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY / ICTY) has indicted Jadranko Prlić, Bruno Stojić, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petković, Valentin Ćorić and Berislav Pušić. Indictees are charged with individual criminal responsibility (Article 7 (1) of the Statute) and criminal responsibility of a superior (Article 7 (3) of the Statute) for crimes against humanity: persecution on political, racial and religious grounds; killing; rape; deportation; inhumane acts; inhumane acts (forcible transfer); inhumane acts (conditions of detention); imprisonment, violations of the laws or customs of war: cruel treatment; cruel treatment (conditions of detention); illegal physical labor; reckless destruction of towns, settlements or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity; destruction or willful damage to institutions dedicated to religion or education; looting of public and private property; unlawful attack on civilians (Mostar); unlawful terrorism of civilians (Mostar); cruel treatment (siege of Mostar), violations of the Geneva Conventions: willful deprivation of life; inhuman treatment (sexual abuse); unlawful deportation of civilians; illegal transfer of civilians; unlawful detention of civilians; inhuman treatment; inhuman treatment (conditions of detention); destruction of large-scale property that is not justified by military necessity, and was carried out illegally and recklessly; confiscation of property that is not justified by military necessity, and was performed illegally and ruthlessly. The trial began on April 26, 2006.The Trial Chamber's judgment of 29 May 2013 concluded that the conflict between the Croatian Army / Croatian Defense Council (HV / HVO) and the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ARBiH) was of an international character. The factual evidence unequivocally showed that HV forces fought together with HVO members against ARBiH, and that the Republic of Croatia exercised general control over the armed forces and civilian authorities of the Croatian Community/Croatian Republic (HZ/HR) of Herceg-Bosna. The Council also found that there was a joint criminal enterprise (JCE) with the ultimate goal of establishing a Croatian entity, partly within the 1939 Croatian Banovina, to enable the unification of the Croatian people. The ultimate goal was the annexation of this area to the territory of the Republic of Croatia in case of disintegration of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (which corresponded to great state claims), or alternatively to make this area an independent state within Bosnia and Herzegovina, closely connected with Croatia. As early as December 1991, members of the HZ Herceg-Bosna leadership (including Mate Boban, president of HZ/HR Herceg-Bosna) and Croatian leaders (including Franjo Tuđman, president of Croatia) assessed that in order to achieve the ultimate goal of establishing a Croatian entity it is necessary to change the national composition of the population in the areas that were calculated to be part of it. JCE participants knew that achieving this goal means removing the Bosniak population from the area of the so-called Herceg-Bosna and that it is in contradiction with the peace negotiations that were held in Geneva. Numerous crimes committed from January 1993 to April 1994 indicate an obvious pattern of behavior where the commission of a crime was the outcome of a plan prepared by JCE participants. The Trial Chamber found that all persons covered by the Indictment made a significant contribution to the implementation of the JCE and that their contribution indicated that they had the intent to pursue a common criminal purpose.Following consideration of the Appeals filed by the Prosecution and the Defense of the Convicts, the ICTY Appeals Chamber issued a final Judgment on 29 November 2017 against Jadranko Prlić, Bruno Stojić, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petković, Valentin Ćorić and Berislav Pušić, declaring them liable for the joint criminal enterprise in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This appellate judgment upheld the convictions handed down by the ICTY Trial Chamber in May 2013. In addition to participating in a joint criminal enterprise, the Appeals Chamber upheld responsibility for killings, persecution on political, racial and religious grounds, deportations, unlawful detention of civilians, forced labor, inhumane acts, inhumane treatment, unlawful and wanton destruction of large-scale property not justified by military necessity, destruction or willful damage to institutions dedicated to religion or education, unlawful attacks on civilians and unlawful terrorism of civilians, and individually for rape and sexual abuse. The verdict confirmed that the participants from Croatia in the joint criminal enterprise were Franjo Tudman, Janko Bobetko and Gojko Šušak. From the presented evidence it was concluded that the leaders of HZ/RHB, including Mato Boban, and the leaders of the Republic of Croatia, including Franjo Tudjman, in December 1991 assessed that the long-term political goal was to achieve the unification of the Croatian people entities, within the borders of the Banovina of Croatia from 1939, it is necessary to carry out “ethnic cleansing” in the territories that were claimed to belong to the HZ/RHB. Evidence confirms that a joint criminal enterprise has been established to achieve the political goal. In this context, it was established that Franjo Tudjman advocated the division of Bosnia and Herzegovina between Croatia and Serbia by annexing part of Bosnia and Herzegovina to Croatia or, if this was not possible, by establishing an autonomous Croatian territory that would be closely connected with Croatia. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić, and Pušić were convicted of crimes against humanity, violations of the laws or customs of war and grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, specifically murder, willful deprivation of life, persecution on political, racial and religious grounds, deportation, unlawful detention of civilians, forced labor, inhumane acts, inhuman treatment, unlawful and wanton destruction of large-scale property not justified by military necessity, looting and confiscation of public and private property under the third category of liability for participation in JCE destruction or intentional infliction damage to institutions dedicated to religion or education, unlawful attacks on civilians and unlawful terrorism of civilians. In addition, Prlić, Stojić, Petković and Ćorić were convicted of rape and inhuman treatment (sexual abuse). Ćorić was additionally convicted for several crimes for which he is responsible as a superior.

More...
Bošnjačke familije općine Srebrenica: Antropogeografska istraživanja (II)

Bošnjačke familije općine Srebrenica: Antropogeografska istraživanja (II)

Author(s): Alija Suljić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 12/2020

This paper explores and analyzes the most important anthropogeographic characteristics of the development of the municipality of Srebrenica until the mid-1990s, especially changes in the economic and educational structure of the municipal population. Particular attention was paid to the territorial distribution, that is, the representation of certain Bosniak families in the settlements of the municipality, as well as the number of households and the total number of persons per family. In addition, the basic demographic losses of Bosniak families in the Srebrenica municipality during the aggression against the independent state of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1992-1995, are presented, as well as the massacres of Bosniak men after the occupation of the so-called UN Srebrenica Safe Zone, July 1995. Data on the number of widows and orphaned children as a result of the mass killing of Bosniak men during aggression and genocide were analyzed and presented by families.

More...
Balkan i Srednja Evropa u metaforičnom zagrljaju

Balkan i Srednja Evropa u metaforičnom zagrljaju

Author(s): Filip Tesař / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 7/2020

„Central Europe“ and the „The Balkans“ are figurative concepts that entail a large amount of metaphors. Unlike „Central Europe“, a large number of negative mataphors are related to „The Balkans“. An important reason for this are the ethnic conflicts at the beginning and end of the 20th century. The term „Central Europe“, which has been consolidated only since the 1980s, is not burdened in a similar way, although the forced national homogenization, after the Second World War, was carried out in this area as well. The term was further consolidated thanks to the existence of the Visegrad Group, formed in 1992, through which the political unity of Poland, The Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia was strengthened. The Visegrad Group has been supporting the entry of the Western Balkan countries into the EU since 2004, and since then the dependent relationship between „The Western Balkans“ and „Central Europe“ has been developing.

More...
Opium, Bonito and Olive Agents: States and Drugs in the Balkans (Beginning of the 19th Century — 1940s)

Opium, Bonito and Olive Agents: States and Drugs in the Balkans (Beginning of the 19th Century — 1940s)

Author(s): Petar Dobrev,Dmitar Grigorov / Language(s): English Issue: 7/2020

Based on archival analysis our paper presents the research which, for the first time, examines the role of opium in some of the nation-states emerged from the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire — Bulgaria, Turkey and Serbia (later the Kingdom of Yugoslavia); tracing the period before World War II. During the interwar period 43% of the opium on the international market came from the contested Macedonian region that was split between Yugoslavia, Bulgaria and Greece after World War I. Following the Yugoslavian-Turkish agreement this percentage increased to 80%, while the Balkans became part of the notorious French connection. By using the methods of Histoire croisée, our report attempts to show the interrelations within the Balkan states in relation to opium politics, the porous new national borders, ethic collaboration and rivalry in the (il)legal opium trade business.

More...

ИЗВЕШТАЈ ЧЛАНОВА САНИТАРНЕ КОМИСИЈЕ АМЕРИЧКОГ ЦРВЕНОГ КРСТА О СТАЊУ У СРБИЈИ И МАКЕДОНИЈИ У ДЕЦЕМБРУ 1915. ГОДИНЕ

Author(s): Biljana Vučetić / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 41/2020

The paper presents the report of members of the Sanitary Commission of the American Red Cross about the situation in Serbia and Macedonia in December 1915, prepared on the request of Lewis Einstein, chargé d’affaires of the American Embassy in Sofia. The members of the American mission pointed to a potential humanitarian disaster following the Bulgarian occupation and the need to implement urgent humanitarian measures in the occupied areas. The report is kept in the National Archives in Washington, as an annex to the letter sent to State Secretary Robert Lansing. Its importance is reflected in the fact that it sheds light on the circumstances in which the civilian population found themselves in the territory occupied by the Bulgarian army. However, the American doctors’ reports are perhaps all the more important as they significantly influenced further activities of the American Red Cross in war-torn Europe, particularly in Serbia during the First World War.

More...

ПЕСМА ЧЕТНИЧКОГ ВОЈВОДЕ КОСТЕ ВОЈИНОВИЋА КОСОВЦА

Author(s): Božica B. Mladenović / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 41/2020

The poem of Kosta Vojinović Kosovac is published and analysed in the paper. Based on excerpts from the diary of Chetnik Duke Kosta Vojinović Kosovac, the time and conditions in which the poem was created and the author’s personality are presented.

More...
Genocid nad Bošnjacima i srpski identitet poslije 1995.godine

Genocid nad Bošnjacima i srpski identitet poslije 1995.godine

Author(s): Rasim Muratović / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 10/2021

This paper discusses the presence of genocide and the persistent threat and possibility of its new eruption in Bosnia. Statements about this, not only in public policies, are dangerous but their more or less subtle involvement in educational programs guarantees the mentioned possibility of a new eruption in the future. Bosniaks are usually advised with bad intentions to look a head and not inwards as a kind of sleeping pill, i.e. anesthesia before amputation.The paper discusses what to do with Serbian ethno-religious nationalism in this context? What kind of ideology is that? What is the Serbian identity like after 1995? How are the contrasts between “us” and “them”painted, and what should be the response of Bosniaks to such challenges?What to do next and how to move on?

More...
Monika Palmberger, How Generations Remember: Conflicting Histories and Shared Memories in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina

Monika Palmberger, How Generations Remember: Conflicting Histories and Shared Memories in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina

Author(s): Hikmet Karčić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 2/2017

Review of: Monika Palmberger, How Generations Remember: Conflicting Histories and Shared Memories in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina, London: The Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

More...
Result 321-340 of 1221
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • ...
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • Next

About

CEEOL is a leading provider of academic eJournals, eBooks and Grey Literature documents in Humanities and Social Sciences from and about Central, East and Southeast Europe. In the rapidly changing digital sphere CEEOL is a reliable source of adjusting expertise trusted by scholars, researchers, publishers, and librarians. CEEOL offers various services to subscribing institutions and their patrons to make access to its content as easy as possible. CEEOL supports publishers to reach new audiences and disseminate the scientific achievements to a broad readership worldwide. Un-affiliated scholars have the possibility to access the repository by creating their personal user account.

Contact Us

Central and Eastern European Online Library GmbH
Basaltstrasse 9
60487 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main HRB 102056
VAT number: DE300273105
Phone: +49 (0)69-20026820
Email: info@ceeol.com

Connect with CEEOL

  • Join our Facebook page
  • Follow us on Twitter
CEEOL Logo Footer
2025 © CEEOL. ALL Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of use | Accessibility
ver2.0.428
Toggle Accessibility Mode

Login CEEOL

{{forgottenPasswordMessage.Message}}

Enter your Username (Email) below.

Institutional Login