DOĞUŞ TEORİLERİ, PARTİ TİPOLOJİLERİ ve KURUMSALLAŞMA ÖLÇÜTLERİ BAĞLAMINDA ANAVATAN PARTİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME
EVALUATION ON ANAVATAN PARTY IN THE CONTEXT OF THEORIES OF EMERGENCY, PARTY TYPOLOGIES and INSTITUTIONALIZATION CRITERIA

Summary/Abstract: The aim of this study is to estimate Anavatan Party founded in the re-transitional period to democracy after military coup of the 12th September in the framework of theories of emergency, party typologies and institutionalization criteria. The questions on which the foundation of ANAP can be clarified in the context of theories of emergency, how this can be evaluated in terms of party typologies and how they can be explained in the context of institutionalization criteria were focused in the study. For the first of all the historical appearance of the party (the instituting process, founding staff, basic values, ideology, the breaking moments from the historical viewpoint) was examined in the study. It came to conclusion that ANAP had been a party emerged in framework of Crisis Theory; Legitimacy Crisis, Theories of Participation Crisis within the context of theories of emergency and finally out of Parliament pursuant to Institutive Theory; In the context of Party Typologies, a result was accomplished that ANAP had peculiarity of a Mass party but had the characteristics of the Catch All Party. It was concluded that complexity and autonomy were strong but the aspects of adaptivity and coherence were weak within the framework of institutionalization criteria.

• Details
• Contents