AN EARLY CRITIQUE OF KELSEN`S PURE THEORY OF LAW: SLOBODAN JOVANOVIĆ ON THE BASIC NORM AND PRIMACY OF INETRNATIONAL LAW
AN EARLY CRITIQUE OF KELSEN`S PURE THEORY OF LAW: SLOBODAN JOVANOVIĆ ON THE BASIC NORM AND PRIMACY OF INETRNATIONAL LAW

Summary/Abstract: The keystone of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law is his doctrine of the basic norm. The basic norm is therefore the subject of Jovanović’s critique of Kelsen’s entire theory. According to Kelsen, the basic norm precedes the authority of a state, since it is positioned between the factual social force, which establishes the authority of the state, and the state. According to Jovanović, there is neither the law without a state, nor a state without the law; hence neither can Kelsenian legal norm, perceived as a norm prior to the state, be a positive legal norm, but an abstract, natural law norm. Jovanović discusses and criticizes Kelsen’s solution to the problem of the relationship between national and international law, which depends on the establishment of the basic norm.

• Details
• Contents