C.E.E.O.L. main page

Croatian Journal of Philosophy

Issue no.29 /2010



  Address: Zastavnice 29
Zagreb/Hrvatski Leskovac (10251), Croatia
  Phone: +38516590417
  Fax: +38516590416
  eMail: kruzak@kruzak.hr

Back to all issues
Back to current issue

Modal Rationalism and the Transference of Meaning    
Asymmetry, Scope, and Rational Consistency    
The Demarcation between Philosophy and Science    
The Impossibility of Political Neutrality    
Translated Title: The Impossibility of Political Neutrality
Publication: Croatian Journal of Philosophy (29/2010)
Author Name: Iwasa, Noriaki;
Language: English
Subject: Philosophy
Issue: 29/2010
Page Range: 147-155
No. of Pages: 9
File size: 98 KB
Download Fee:
(only for
4 Euro (€)
Summary: For some contemporary liberal philosophers, a huge concern is liberal neutrality, which is the idea that the state should be neutral among competing conceptions of the moral good pursued by the people. In The Morality of Freedom, Joseph Raz argues that we can neither achieve nor even approximate such neutrality. He shows that neutrality and fairness are different ideas. His notion of neutrality is stricter than John Rawls’s and Ronald Dworkin’s. Raz shows that both helping and not helping can be neutral or non-neutral, thus neutrality is chimerical. Wojciech Sadurski’s appeal to rational expectations does not necessarily tell us which action is neutral. Distinguishing between comprehensive and narrow neutrality, Raz also claims that only the former is a proper response to conflicts. Sadurski criticizes it, claiming that conflicts are comprehensive in a sense which does not deny the adequacy of the narrow neutrality. In reality, however, it is almost impossible to achieve even the narrow neutrality. A theory is presented to explain why political neutrality is almost impossible to achieve. Philosophically, there is no neutral ground for neutral politics.
Keywords: Joseph Raz; Wojciech Sadurski; liberalism; liberal neutrality; neutral politics; political philosophy; political theory
A Systematic Interpretation of Hobbes’s Practical Philosophy