C.E.E.O.L. main page

Studia Phaenomenologica

Issue no.III (1-2) /2003


Societatea Română de Fenomenologie

  Address: 49 Kogalniceanu Blvd., ap, 45
Bucureşti (RO-050104), Romania
  Phone: +40213117977
  Fax: +40213117977
  eMail: office@ phenomenology.ro

Back to all issues
Back to current issue

Content Studia Phaenomenologica III (1-2)/2003    
The School Of Brentano And Husserlian Phenomenology - Introduction    
Franz Brentano: „Grossvater Der Phänomenologie“    
Quelques remarques sur la doctrine brentanienne de l’évidence    
Ist die Empfindung intentional? Der brentanosche Hintergrund einer Kritik Husserls    
„Inseln des Unglücks“. Über das schlechte in der Summation des guten Aristoteles-Brentano-Katkov    
Espace et mouvement chez Stumpf et Husserl. Une approche méréologique    
Le différend logique: jugement et énoncé. Eléments pour une reconstruction du débat entre Husserl et Marty    
Meinong On The Phenomenology Of Assumption    
Husserl and the Infinite    
Translated Title: Husserl And The Infinite
Publication: Studia Phaenomenologica (III (1-2)/2003)
Author Name: Ierna, Carlo;
Language: English
Subject: Philosophy
Issue: III (1-2)/2003
Page Range: 179-194
No. of Pages: 16
File size: 97 KB
Download Fee:
(only for
7 Euro (€)
Summary: Edmund Husserl began his academic career as a mathematician, studying with some of the best mathematicians of his time (like Weierstrass and Kronecker). Subsequently, he turned to philosophy, field in which he also had the extraordinary opportunity to work with one of the most influential philosophers of the nineteenth century: Franz Brentano. In Husserl’s early work these two influences generate a unique mix and I think that it is very interesting to investigate the way in which Husserl deals with some of the most fundamental problems of mathematics and philosophy of mathematics, like the problems posed by concepts such as that of infinity. In this article1 I will analyse Husserl’s conception of the infinite as expressed in the paragraph Unendliche Mengen of his Philosophie der Arithmetik (PA).2 I will give a short exposition on his distinction between proper and symbolic presentations and then proceed to the logical distinctions that Husserl makes between finite and infinite symbolic collections. Subsequently (in section 2.3), I will discuss Husserl’s addition of surrogate
presentations as a sub-type of symbolic presentations in his short treatise Zur Logik der Zeichen (Semiotik).3 In this later text (which was originally intended as an appendix to the never published second volume of the PA) Husserl gives a more detailed account of how we can conceive of the infinite, using surrogate presentations. Allow me to begin, however, with a brief survey of Husserl’s mathematical background and of other important influences that he underwent in this early period. Especially interesting in this respect is the influence, both mathematical and philosophical, of Bernard Bolzano. I will not focus on the vast impact that the teachings of Brentano and Stumpf had on Husserl, since these have already been abundantly discussed elsewhere.
Husserl’s Elementary Logic. The 1896 Lectures In Their Nineteenth Century Context    
Zwischen Sagen und Zeigen. Überlegungen zu Husserls Theorie der okkasionellen Ausdrücke    
Percevoir et juger le rôle de la croyance originelle (Urdoxa) dans la théorie du jugement de Husserl    
In Memoriam Karl Schumann (1941-2003)    
Book reviews