|
Cover (2-2011)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Of Mice and Men: Adorno on Art and the Suffering of Animals
|
|
 |
 |
| Translated Title: |
Of Mice and Men: Adorno on Art and the Suffering of Animals |
| Publication: |
Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics
(XLVIII (2)/2011) |
| Author Name: |
Flodin, Camilla;
|
| Language: |
English |
| Subject: |
Philosophy |
| Issue: |
XLVIII (2)/2011 |
| Page Range: |
139-156 |
| No. of Pages: |
18 |
| File size: |
230
KB |
Download Fee:
(only for non-subscribers) |
10 Euro (€) |
| Summary: |
Theodor W. Adorno’s criticism of human beings’ domination of nature is a familiar topic to Adorno scholars. Its connection to the central relationship between art and nature in his aesthetics has, however, been less analysed. In the following paper, I claim that Adorno’s discussion of art’s truth content (Wahrheitsgehalt) is to be understood as art’s ability to give voice to nature (both human and non-human) since it has been subjugated by the growth of civilization. I focus on repressed non-human nature and examine Adorno’s interpretation of Eduard Mörike’s poem ‘Mausfallen-Sprüchlein’ (Mousetrap rhyme). By giving voice to the repressed animal, Mörike’s poem manages to point towards the possibility of a changed relationship between mice and men, between nature and humanity, which is necessary in order to achieve reconciliation amongst humans as well. |
| Keywords: |
Adorno T.; non-human nature; repressed animals; Mörike E.; truth of art |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Aesthetics in the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Unitas Multiplex as the Basis of Plotinus’ Conception of Beauty
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Leopold Blaustein: Imaginary Representations; The Role of Perception in Aesthetic Experience
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
News: Announcing the Winner of the Estetika Student Essay Competition
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The 5th Mediterranean Congress of Aesthetics (conference report)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Denis Dutton. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution (review)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Steven Shaviro. Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics (review)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |